Xbox At E3: New Controller, Game Emulation, And Plenty Of Exclusives
Likely the biggest news of the day was the announcement that Xbox 360 games will be playable on the Xbox One. Microsoft has built an Xbox 360 software emulator which can be launched in order to play titles from their older console. This is not vaporware either; the emulator is available starting today for people in the Xbox preview program. Currently the selection of titles is limited and more will be converted before launch, with the Xbox team targeting a holiday release for this feature. The feature will work with games that have been purchased digitally or on disc, and if you have the disc, you have to insert it, and the system will download the files to the Xbox One. I assume the disc will need to be in the device in order to play as well. So although this is an emulator, clearly Microsoft is doing a lot of work on converting the code to run quickly on the much different hardware in the Xbox One, which is x86 based, as compared to the Xbox 360’s PowerPC architecture. Fans can vote on Xbox Feedback which games they want to see converted first, and more will be added over time.
In addition, the Microsoft has created the Xbox Elite Controller, which offers up a lot more options and customizations than the current Xbox Controller. Players can choose among six thumbsticks, with different shapes, sizes, and heights, to tailor the controller to your own gaming style. The D-Pad is also new, with a unique faceted face which should help in some games, or you can switch to the traditional D-Pad if the title prefers the accuracy of that pad.
There are four slots on the back for interchangeable paddles, giving you access to more commands with more fingers. There are also hair trigger locks which reduce the movement necessary to activate the triggers, which are valuable in a game where the full range of trigger motion is not necessary. It can quickly be deactivated to get the full range back.
There will be an Xbox Accessories App on both the Xbox One and Windows 10 to let you customize the experience and map buttons, and you can save up to 255 controller profiles for custom settings on many games. You can even load two profiles and switch between them on the fly.
The thumbsticks are stainless steel, and there are low-friction reinforced rings around the thumbsticks for a long life. The new controller will retail for $149.99 and has availability in October.
Moving on from the new controller (which it appears I need to get) Microsoft also reiterated its new partnership with Oculus for the Rift launch, but in addition they are also partnering with Valve VR. This is very interesting since Valve seems to have had a cool relationship with Microsoft over the last couple of years, and it is great to see them working together on Virtual Reality. Microsoft also showed off their own Augmented Reality device, the Hololens, with a custom version of Minecraft which players can explore and build with using Microsoft’s own headset.
There was also plenty of software talk today as well, since any piece of hardware needs quality software. Microsoft is adding a new feature to allow players to try out games while they are being developed with the launch of the Xbox Game Preview pilot program. This is a lot like Steam’s Early Access. Microsoft was keen to point out that they have a lot of indie developers on-board.
Last, but certainly not least, is the list of upcoming Xbox titles, some of which are exclusive to Xbox and some of which will have a limited exclusivity window. Exclusive games to Xbox include Ashen, Cuphead, Fable Legends, Forza Motorsport 6, Gears of War: Ultimate Edition, Gears of War 4, Gigantic, Halo 5: Guardians, Rare Replay (a collection of old Rare games), ReCore, and Sea Thieves, with Beyond Eyes, Tacoma, and the much anticipated Rise of the Tomb Raider being timed exclusives on the platform.
Microsoft has not had the success with the Xbox One, compared in relative terms at least, to the Xbox 360, and with this briefing being exclusively focused on gaming, and the introduction of a special controller for the enthusiast crowd, Microsoft is trying to win back some mindshare. Only time will tell if they are successful.
Read More ...
A First Look At Apple's OS X El Capitan
Right on schedule, at last week’s World Wide Developers Conference Apple announced the next iteration of their desktop OS, OS X. Version 10.11, dubbed El Capitan, is the latest in Apple’s string of yearly OS updates. And with this now being the 3rd iteration of the company’s initiative to offer free desktop operating system upgrades, it’s safe to say that the company has settled into what is the new norm.
Meanwhile released alongside the pagentry of WWDC was the very first developer beta of El Capitan. Typically we would see Apple keep the OS under wraps from the public for another month or two until the public beta opens, however this year Apple is seemingly trying something a little different when it comes to engaging consumers and the press during the developer beta period. Rather than clamming up entirely – developers are under non-disclosure agreements – Apple invited us to take a first look at the beta OS, loaning us a 2015 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro with OS X El Capitan preloaded. To that end, today we are taking our first look at El Capitan, checking out the major new features of the OS and experiencing first-hand the software Apple is putting together for later this year.
Read More ...
Comparing OpenGL ES To Metal On iOS Devices With GFXBench Metal
The need for a low level graphics API in the PC space has been fairly obvious for some time now. The level of abstraction in earlier versions of DirectX and OpenGL allows them to work with a wide variety of graphics hardware, but this comes with a significant amount of overhead. One of the biggest issues caused by this is reduced draw call throughput. A simple explanation of a draw call is that it is the command sent by the CPU which tells the GPU to render an object (or part of an object) in a frame. CPUs are already hard-pressed to keep up with high-end GPUs even with a low level API, and the increased overhead of a high level graphics API further reduces the amount that can be issued in a given period of time. This overhead mainly exists because most graphics APIs will do shader compilation and state validation (ensuring API use is valid) when a draw call is made, which takes up valuable CPU time that could be used to do other things like physics processing or drawing more objects.
Because a draw call involves the CPU preparing materials be rendered, developers can use tricks such as batching, which involves grouping together items of the same type to be rendered with a single draw call. Even this can present its own issues, such as objects not being culled when they are out of the frame. Another trick is instancing, which involves making a draw call for a single object that appears many times, and having the GPU duplicate it to various coordinates in the frame. Despite this, the overhead of the graphics API combined with the time that it takes the CPU itself to issue a draw call ultimately limits how many can be made. This reduces the number of unique objects developers can put on screen, as well as the amount of CPU time that is available to perform other tasks. Low level graphics APIs aim to address this by removing much of the overhead that exists in current graphics APIs.
The question to ask is why do Apple and iOS developers need a low level graphics API for their mobile games? The answer ends up being the same as the PC space. While the mobile space has seen tremendous improvements in both CPU and GPU processing power, the pace of CPU improvements is slowing when compared to GPU improvements. In addition, the increases GPU processing power were always of a greater magnitude than the CPU increases. You can see this in the chart above, which shows the level of the CPU and GPU performance of the iPad relative to its original model. Having CPU performance improve by a factor of twelve in less than five years is extremely impressive, yet it pales in comparison to the GPU performance which, in the case of the iPad Air 2, is 180 times faster than its original version.
Because of this widening gap between CPU and GPU speeds, it appears that even mobile devices have begun to experience the issue of the GPU being able to draw things much faster than the CPU can issue commands to do so. Metal aims to address this issue by cutting through much of the abstraction that exists in OpenGL ES, and this is possible in part because of Apple's control over their hardware and software in their devices. Apple designs their own CPU architectures, and while they don't design the GPU architecture, it's clear they're free to do what they desire to with the IP to create the GPUs they need.
The other side of the discussion is compatibility. Much of the abstraction in higher level graphics APIs is done to support a wide variety of hardware. Low level graphics APIs often are not as portable or widely compatible as high level ones, and this is also true of Metal. The iOS Metal API currently only works on devices that use GPUs based on Imagination Technologies' Rogue architecture, which limits it to devices that use Apple's A7, A8, and A8X SoCs.
This can pose a dilemma for developers, as programming only for Metal limits the number of users they can target with their application. The number of older iPads and iPhones still in use, as well as Apple's insistence on selling the original iPad Mini and iPod Touch which use their A5 SoC from 2011, can limit the market for games that use Metal. If I were to make a prediction, it would be that Metal's adoption among iOS developers will grow substantially in the next year or two when devices that use the A5 and A6 chips are retired from sale.
Kishonti Informatics, the developer of the GFXBench GPU benchmarking application, have released a new version of their benchmark. The new benchmark is called GFXBench Metal, and it's essentially the same benchmark as the normal GFXBench 3.0 / 3.1. The difference is that this version of the benchmark has been built to use Apple's Metal API rather than OpenGL ES. Although it's not one of the first Metal applications, it's one of the first benchmarks that can give some insight into what improvements developers and users can see when games and other 3D applications are built using Metal rather than OpenGL ES.
Before getting into the results, I did want to address one disparity that may be noticed about the non-Metal iPad Air 2 results. It appears that Apple has been making some driver optimizations for the A8X GPU with iOS releases that have come out since our original review. Because of this, the iPad Air 2's performance in the OpenGL version of GFXBench 3.0 is noticeably improved over our original results. To avoid incorrectly characterizing the improvements that Metal brings to the table, all of the iPad tests for the OpenGL and Metal versions of the benchmark were re-run on iOS 8.3. Those are the results that are used here. Testing with the iPhone 5s and 6 revealed that there are no notable improvements to the performance of Apple A7 and A8 devices.
GFXBench 3.0's driver overhead test is one we don't normally publish, but in this circumstance it's one of the most important tests to examine. What this test does is render a large number of very simple objects. While that sounds like an easy task, the test renders each object one by one, and issues a separate draw call for each. This is essentially the most inefficient way possible to render the scene, as the GPU will be limited by the draw call throughput of the CPU and the graphics API managing them.
In this test, it's clear that Metal provides an enormous increase in performance. Even the lowest performance improvement for a device on Metal compared to OpenGL is still well over a 3x increase. While this test is obviously very artificial, it's an indication that Metal does indeed provide an enormous improvement in draw call throughput for developers to take advantage of.
While the driver overhead test is an interesting way of looking at how Metal allows for more draw call throughput, it's important to look at how it performs with actual graphics tests that simulate the type of visuals you would see in a 3D game. In both the Manhattan and T-Rex HD parts of GFXBench we do see an improvement when using Metal instead of OpenGL ES, but the gains are not enormous. The iPad Air 2 shows the greatest improvement, with an 11% increase in frame rate in T-Rex HD, and an 8.5% increase in Manhattan.
The relatively small improvements in these real world benchmarks illustrate an important point about Metal, which is that it is not a magic bullet to boost graphics performance. While there will definitely be small improvements due to general API efficiency and lower overhead, Metal's real purpose is to enable new levels of visual fidelity that were previously not possible on mobile devices. An example of this is the Epic Zen Garden application from Epic Games. The app renders at 1440x1080 with 4x MSAA on the iPad, and it displays 3500 animated butterflies on the screen at the same time. This scene has an average of 4000 draw calls per frame, which is well above what can currently be achieved with OpenGL ES on mobile hardware.
I think that Metal and other low level graphics APIs have a bright future. The introduction of Metal on OS X can simplify the process of bringing games to both Apple's desktop and mobile platforms. In the mobile space, developers of the most complicated 3D applications and games will be eager to adopt Metal as they begin to hit the limits of what visuals can be accomplished under OpenGL ES. While there are titles like Modern Combat 5 which use both Metal and OpenGL ES depending on the device, that method of development prevents you from using any of Metal's advantages effectively, as they will not scale to the OpenGL ES version. I cannot stress enough how much the continued sale of Apple A5 and A6 devices impedes the transition to using Metal only, and I hope that by the time Apple updates their product lines again those devices will be gone from sale, and eventually gone from use. Until that time, we'll probably see OpenGL ES continue to be used in most mobile game titles, with Metal serving as a glimpse of the mobile games that are yet to come.
Read More ...
The Acer Aspire R 13 Review: Convertible Notebook With A Twist
The world of the convertible notebook has come a long way in just a couple of years, but we seem to have settled in on two basic types of convertible devices. There are the tablet style devices where the display can be removed from the keyboard and used separately, and there are the notebook style devices where the keyboard can be rotated around and under the display in order to act like a tablet. Acer has decided to try something different with the Aspire R 13 which features their Ezel Aero hinge.
Read More ...
Lumia 940 and 1040 Teased at in Alleged Leaked Images
Microsoft's new flagship devices are only a couple months from market
Read More ...
Microsoft Airs New Xbox One Controllers, 1 TB SKU, and Backwards Compatibility
After a win in April, Microsoft is hungry to try to steal the sales lead from Sony
Read More ...
Available Tags:Xbox , iOS , Acer , Notebook , Microsoft ,
No comments:
Post a Comment