
NVIDIA Fermi PhysX demo screenshots and information
While the focus of NVIDIA's "Fermi" architecture announcement was well and truly upon its abilities in terms of GPU computing, CUDA and the like, that didn't prevent PhysX getting a mention during proceedings, and indeed a demonstration of some advanced PhysX processing running on Fermi hardware.آ NVIDIA has now provided some more information about, and screenshots of, the demo shown during yesterday's GTC keynote speech.
You can check out a handful of screenshots from this demo by way of an automated slide show by clicking on the image below:
Read More ...
Elite Bastards review: NesteQ FanMax 8-channel fan controller
If you're running a system with a lot of fans for optimal cooling, then chances are you'll want some way to control them all to keep a handle on both temperatures and noise levels.آ Enter NesteQ's FanMax controller, with support for up to eight fans and the ability to split them into a pair of fan "groups" which can be enabled or disabled at the touch of a button.آ Is it worthy of consideration as a possible purchase?آ We check it out.
NesteQ FanMax 8-channel fan controller review
As always your thoughts and comments on this review are most welcome, and can be left in our forum.
Read More ...
NVIDIA reveals next-generation "Fermi" GPU architecture
As part of NVIDIA's GPU Technology Conference which is currently ongoing in San Jose, California, the GPU giant has lifted the lid on what will be their next-generation architecture, a part now known to be codenamed "Fermi".آ So, what's it all about?آ A number of sites spill the beans.
At the high level the specs are simple. Fermi has a 384-bit GDDR5 memory interface and 512 cores. That's more than twice the processing power of GT200 but, just like RV870 (Cypress), it's not twice the memory bandwidth.
The architecture goes much further than that, but NVIDIA believes that AMD has shown its cards (literally) and is very confident that Fermi will be faster. The questions are at what price and when.
Many of the changes, especially the ones Nvidia is talking about at present, are directed toward improving the GPU's suitability and performance for non-graphics applications. Indeed, Nvidia has invested tremendous amounts in building a software infrastructure for CUDA and in engaging with its customers, and it claims quite a few of the tweaks in this architecture were inspired by that experience. There's much to cover here, and I've tried to organize it in a logical manner, but that means some key parts of the architecture won't be addressed immediately.
Each SM includes 32 CUDA processing cores (4x the previous GT200 design) as you can see above but also introduces other new features to help improve performance.آ Each processor includes a fully pipelined integer and floating point unit that implements the newer IEEE 754-2008 standard – another important move for GPU computing.آ The new Evergreen core from AMD also implements this standard as it adds support for the fused multiply-add instruction.
Also included in each SM are 16 load and store units and 4 special function units to handle calculations like sin and cosine.
NVIDIA is claiming that the double precision performance of the Fermi architecture will be greatly improved over the existing GT200 design.
It is in this context that Nvidia has announced a next generation architecture, which aims for even greater performance, reliability and programmability; unlocking even more software capabilities. This new architecture goes by several names to the keep the unwary on their toes: Fermi or GF100, although some in the press are mistakenly bandying about GT200. Nvidia has chosen to primarily discuss architecture and not to disclose most microarchitecture or implementation details in this announcement. Where possible, our educated speculation fills these gaps and will be clearly noted as such. The lack of details is partially due to the fact that products based on Fermi will not be out for several months – and even this timeline is unclear.
Curiously, they are also not discussing the graphical capabilities of this chip and instead focusing only on compute. Hence our discussion is focused primarily on the GPU as a compute device. Accordingly, we will try and use standard terminology and point out where and how GPU terminology differs.
Read More ...

No comments:
Post a Comment